Your source for the Pro Se Self-Help Guidebook Series of books.
New Developments & Additions
How To
Modify Your Alimony Payments
All Items
on this page were edited and contributed by the author in further support of
his books. You are encouraged to read "all" of them as they will have
application in your cases. Even if you live in another state, you can use
them in your state case cite searches by finding "keywords" in the cites you
can use when doing your searches. These cites give you valuable hints as to
the terminology used by the legal profession.
Note:
Visitors to
this webpage are invited to send any information to the author that you feel would be appropriate
to add to this page. in care of:
Florida
Statutes Annotated which gives caselaw cites that are related to
various aspects of alimony. Use this as a guide to what you can do in
your state.
Related legal assistance links can be seen by
clicking here.
09/10/08 -
Caught Net - exposes
judges, judicial misconduct, prosecutorial misconduct, legal misconduct,
ethics violations and civil rights violations and more. There are some
tactics you can use in court if you have problems with judges.
08/17/08 -
KAHN v. KAHN, 78 So.2d 367 (Fla. 1955) -
Justification for the
termination of "lifetime" alimony with the statement " the fact that the
marriage has been brought to an end because of the fault of the husband does
not necessarily entitle the wife to be forever supported by a former husband
who has little, if any, more economic advantages than she has."
08/01/08 -
Imputed Income: advice from a
defendant -
Let me share my experience when
it comes to trying to impute income or determine whether the ex is
employable or how quickly employable and to what monetary level.
My ex at time of divorce was self-employed in a mostly
50% cash and 50% credit card business. We tried two things. First I got an
accountant to show how much business she was really doing by going over her
three bank accounts and check and cash transactions. This was considerably
more than the books she would give me at the end of the year to file joint
income tax return. It was also considerably more than her financial
disclosure forms which she refiled multiple times through the divorce and
each time her income stream diminishing.
My mistake (actually my idiot attorney's mistake) was
that the accountant she got me was not a "court certified" forensic
accountant. My ex's attorney tore him apart in court on cross examination,
never questioning the figures he came up with (which were correct) but
rather showing that since he was not recognized in the courts as an expert,
his testimony was "suspect". What he uncovered in the accounting of the
three bank accounts any one of us could have uncovered but that was besides
the point, it was all now "suspect". The judge threw out everything that was
introduced in court in terms of my ex's financials.
Secondly, and it gets to the point of this reply, we
acquired a vocational expert to show several things. First, that the
business my ex is in is lucrative, secondly, her degrees from the early 80's
while never used, were still marketable in the local market, and an estimate
of what income could be made, with examples and all.
When we went to introduce this testimony in pre-trial
hearings, my ex's attorney filed a motion that if we are allowed to have
this vocational expert witness, that they would get another one, AT MY
EXPENSE, to counter what he had to say. Since this was at my expense, they
would probably get the best of the best, or in other words, a more
recognized expert witness to trump mine. In essence, it would have been
anywhere between 5 to 10,000 dollars out of my pocket for testimony that
would have washed each other out. The judge, of course, ruled in favor of my
ex so I dropped that avenue.
In Broward where the divorce took place, judges are not
moved around. It is up to the judge's discretion to change from family court
to civil to criminal. Any future motions I file in my divorce decree goes in
front of the same judge so I am laying low for now. I can always file a
motion to recluse the judge from my case but it is a very very difficult
motion to win and in my opinion, another loss of 5 to 10K of money that I
would rather withhold from spending until I decide to go all out in one
final "mother of all modification" efforts down the road.
07/25/08 -
More on the loyalty oath - Here
is a
Writ of Quo Warranto used to challenge a judges authority to sit
upon the bench. This case shows that the challenge to the judge should be
early in the proceedings and should be done in the lower courts...not the
appellate courts. In Florida, statistics have shown that the majority of
judges have not signed this oath.
07/07/24/08 -
Linstroth v. Dorgan,
4D07-1493 (Fla.App. 4 Dist.
6-11-2008)Read
Justice Farmer's dissent starting on page 6 in which he delineates the
factors that define a supportive relationship in the case of a cohabitating
spouse. The dissent does not provide a case precedent but can be used as a
persuasive argument and gives an indication of what the trend will be in the
future.
07/24/08 -
Alimony Garnishments:
A financial institution can take
protected government benefits only under five conditions, according to the
Social Security Administration
07/17/08 -
Florida’s Homestead Realty:
Is it Exempt from Imposition of
an Equitable Lien for Nonpayment of Alimony and Child Support? A Florida Bar
Assn. article.
05/30/08 -
In the event your judge
won't allow spectators -
Request that spectators be
allowed to observe the proceedings at your hearingin accordance
with Florida Family Law Rules of Proceure RULE 12.400 which states:
CONFIDENTIALITY OF RECORDS AND PROCEEDINGS:
In the Commentary Adopted in 1995, it says Judicial proceedings and
records should be public except when substantial compelling
circumstances, especially the protection of children or of business
trade secrets, require otherwise. Family law matters frequently present
such circumstances. It is intended that this rule be applied to protect
the interests of minor children from offensive testimony and to protect
children in a divorce proceeding.
[Note: it is good to have a court reporter attend at the same time.]
03/27/08 -
Trick of the Trade in
framing your case:
In his opening
argument, a good attorney will pull out the applicable statute or case
and go down the list of "tests" or factors deemed controlling by statute
or case law. With the statute in his hand, he covers the factors deemed
controlling by statute or case law one by one in his examinations and
cross examinations of both parties. In his closing argument, he then
points out the differences between the parties as to each of those
factors. During the case he will argue that anything else brought up is
irrelevant and inadmissible. This tactic often keeps an honest judge
honest and frames the arguments to your advantage. This tactic alone may
win your case!
says "we find that the language used in the
parties' post-nuptial agreement, incorporated into the final judgment of
dissolution of marriage, indicates a clear intention that the
agreed-upon alimony provisions control and that their terms would be
modifiable only as provided by the agreement."
Be aware of this
software that could be used to falsify financial affidavits supporting
documents. Unless cross-checked with tax returns, they could
probably be successfully used by one of the parties to deceive the other party.
website has been added that
contains multiple dictionaries for you to use.
Antipeonage Website -
We can define being
forced to work to pay alimony as "peonage." Want to include this
tactic in your court documents or arguments? The Antipeonage Act of 1867,
42 U.S.C. §1994, reads:: "The holding of any person to service or labor under
the system known as peonage is abolished and forever prohibited in any
Territory or State of the United States; and all acts, laws,
resolutions, orders, regulations, or usages of any Territory or State,
which have heretofore established, maintained, or enforced, or by virtue
of which any attempt shall hereafter be made to establish, maintain, or
enforce, directly or indirectly, the voluntary or involuntary service or
labor of any persons as peons, in liquidation of any debt or obligation,
or otherwise, are declared null and void." (Note
- even though it appears to define alimony, the courts will probably
dismiss this argument as it has been used before without much success
along with the "involuntary servitude" argument.
Click here
for summary.)
A woman who is the primary
breadwinner in her marriage could wind up paying support after a
divorce. And sometimes she should, lawyers contend.
12/10/07 -
How to File Criminal Charges Against Your
Ex-Spouse -
Note: purchasers of
our How To Modify Your Alimony Payments book/ebook can get a copy of this technique/tactic by emailing us a
request at the "Contact Us" address in the above menu.
Alimony
and retirement. Notice how the appellant had been less than truthful on
his financial affidavit regarding real estate holdings. You have to be
careful of placing the ex-spouse in "peril of poverty."
Look at this case indicating the importance of
having had a court reporter at the trial court proceedings. Also, the
imputation of income to the spouse aspect.
09/27/07
-
For those of you
who are unable to afford some software programs such as MS Word, MS
Office, etc., there are other options. The most widely used alternative
to Office is an open-source program called
OpenOffice, which is sponsored
by Sun Microsystems. OpenOffice tries to match all the major features of
Microsoft's program.
There are a variety of Web-based programs
that can replace all or parts of the Office programs, including
ThinkFree Office
Online, word processor
Writely, spreadsheet maker
NumSum,
and e-mail program Thunderbird. All of this software is significantly
less expensive that Microsoft Office -- it's absolutely free.
OpenOffice can read files created in Microsoft Office, and it can create
new files that Office can open. So, ideally, you could take home
spreadsheets created at work using Excel, and work on them on your home
computer without having to buy Office.
We offer
a disclaimer that this website does not represent legal advice nor is it a
solicitation for legal work.
Further, the opinions and comments expressed represent those of the
webmaster exclusively.